考虑公平关切信息不对称的双渠道低碳供应链定价策略
首发时间:2024-08-21
摘要:在碳达峰碳中和的发展要求下,构建一个制造商承担减排任务同时零售商负责低碳宣传的双渠道供应链系统,分别求解四种情形下的Stackelberg博弈模型,探讨零售商的公平关切及信息分享策略对供应链定价决策、市场和利润的影响。研究表明:无论信息是否对称,零售商公平关切未必总是降低批发价格;信息对称时,公平关切行为与决策和需求均没有必然联系;信息不对称时,公平关切行为能够对零售价格、低碳宣传努力水平、直销市场需求产生正向影响,但对零售市场需求会产生不利影响。零售商公平关切行为无法提高供应链系统的绩效,甚至会对其自身利润获取带来巨大挑战。
For information in English, please click here
Pricing strategy of dual-channel low-carbon supply chain considering fairness and information asymmetry
Abstract:Under the development requirements of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, a dual-channel supply chain system is constructed in which the manufacturer undertakes the task of reducing emissions while the retailer is responsible for low-carbon promotion. The Stackelberg game model is solved in four situations to discuss the impact of retailers\' fairness concerns and information sharing strategies on supply chain pricing decisions, markets, and profits. Research shows that regardless of whether the information is symmetrical or not, retailers\' fairness concerns may not always lower wholesale prices. When information is symmetric, fairness concerns behaviors are not necessarily related to decision-making and demand; when information is asymmetric, fairness concerns behaviors have a positive impact on retail prices, the level of low-carbon publicity efforts and direct sales market demand, but will have a negative impact on retail market demand. Retailers\' fairness concerns cannot improve the performance of the supply chain system, and may even pose huge challenges to their own profit acquisition.
Keywords: Logistics engineering and managemnet Fairness concerns Infoemation asymmetry
基金:
引用
No.****
动态公开评议
共计0人参与
勘误表
考虑公平关切信息不对称的双渠道低碳供应链定价策略
评论
全部评论