不同连作年限野生地黄根际土壤微生物群落多样性分析
首发时间:2014-06-11
摘要:以野生地黄头茬土壤、野生地黄重茬土壤、野生状态地黄土壤以及对照土壤为研究对象,通过磷脂脂肪酸法(PLFA)和末端限制性片段长度多态性(T-RFLP)技术,分析了不同连作年限野生地黄的根际微生物生物量和群落结构的变化。田间生长状况观察发现,野生地黄连续种植导致植株矮小弱化、块根无法正常生长膨大且出现大量枯萎死亡现象,而野生状态和头茬种植的野生地黄都能够正常生长,且未出现病虫害症状。PLFA分析结果表明,不同处理情况下地黄根际土壤微生物群落结构存在明显差异,具体表现为野生状态地黄土壤和头茬土壤菌群相对一致,重茬与野生状态地黄、头茬地黄相比,细菌/真菌比例下降。T-RFL的进一步分析结果表明不同处理情况下地黄根际土壤细菌群落结构也存在一定差异,比库分析发现,野生状态地黄和头茬地黄土壤中变形菌门和厚壁菌门占据优势地位。野生状态地黄和头茬地黄根际富集大量Bacillus, Pseudomonas等有益生防菌,而重茬地黄根际土壤大量滋生病原菌Clostridium, Flexibacter polymorphus, Clostridium ghoni,且不利于有益菌群和纤维素降解菌群的定植,qRT-PCR绝对定量分析也验证了野生状态地黄土壤和头茬土壤中的假单胞菌数量都显著高于重茬土壤。总之,野生地黄连作同样存在连作障碍问题,而且连作导致野生地黄根际有益菌数量减少而病原菌大量滋生,从而降低了野生地黄抵御病害的能力,导致重茬野生地黄生长发育不良,产量大幅削减。
关键词: 地黄 磷脂脂肪酸 末端限制性片段长度多态性 微生物多样性 植物根际称
For information in English, please click here
Microflora diversity analysis of R.rehmannia rhizospheric soil in different monoculture years
Abstract:The rhizospheric soils sampled from the four different plots, including the newly planted, the two-year monoculture , the wild R. glutinosa and the control, were used to study the biomass and shifts of soil microflora by PLFA and T-RFLP analysis. It was observed that the wild R. glutinosa under continuous monoculture were small and weakening, unable normal growth, withered and ultimately died, while the wild R. glutinosa and newly planted were able to grow normally and no plant diseases and insect pests appeared. PLFA analysis indicated that the microbial community structure was significantly different among the wild R. glutinosa rhizospheric soils with different years of monoculture. There was relative consistency between wild R. glutinosa rhizospheric soil and new planted wild R. glutinosa soil. Compared with R. glutinosa rhizospheric and new planted soil,The ratio of bacteria/fungus in two-year monoculture soil declined. Furthered analysis by T-RFLP suggested that there were some diference in bacterial comunity structure of R. glutinosa rhizospheric soils. It was found that the bacteria belong to Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were predominent in the wild and newly planted R. glutinosa soils. Some beneficial biocontrol bacteria (such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, etc) gathered in the rhizosphere of wild and newly planted R. glutinosa, however a large number of pathogenic bacteria bred in the rhizospheric soil of the two-year monoculture R. glutinosa, such as Clostridium, Flexibacter polymorphus, Clostridium ghoni, etc, and which went anainst the colonization of beneficial bacteria and cellulose degradation bacterium. For further study, qRT-PCR analysis verified that the total number of pseudomonads was much higher in wild and newly planted R. glutinosa soils than in two-year monoculture soil. In conclusion, wild R. glutinosa monoculture exists consecutive monoculture problem as well. And the pathogenic microbes bred seriously in the rhizospheric soil of wild R. glutinosa under the monoculture regime, and yet the number of beneficial bacteria declined, which weakened the ability of wild R. glutinosa to resist the disease so that the two-year wild R. glutinosa grew abnormally and the yield decreased drastically.
Keywords: Rehmannia glutinosa, PLFA, T-RFLP, Microbial diversity, plant rhizosphere
基金:
论文图表:
引用
No.4599789981713140****
同行评议
勘误表
不同连作年限野生地黄根际土壤微生物群落多样性分析
评论
全部评论